Search for: "Smith v. USPS - United States Post Office"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm
United States Postal Service, which will determine if the government is able to initiate review proceedings for patents. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
The fact that you get thrown out of the United States forever because the USPS messed up is, well, tough.But Judge Kleinfeld's dissent is a perfect example of a different type of reasoning; in a way, a different type of judging. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Patent and Trademark Office under a 2011 federal statute, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:01 pm
County of Erie Tax Claim Bureau, 59 A.3d 50, 55 (Pa.Cmwlth.2013) (citations omitted); Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Because the post office hiring register includes tests scores and other confidential, USPS keeps the information confidential under the Privacy Act,5 U.S.C. 552a and refused to disclose information requested by the union. [read post]
